4 ms·
No, again, it’s pretty specific. The core teaching of CRT and gender theory is that it it’s more important what group you belong to than what you are as an indi
by cloutchaser 4y ago
No, again, it’s pretty specific. The core teaching of CRT and gender theory is that it it’s more important what group you belong to than what you are as an individual.
This is completely incompatible with individual based rights that the western world grew on for the last 50-100-150 years. And by west I mean a broad amount of countries not just the US.
- ben_w 4y agoCRT’s core teaching is that “race” isn’t a meaningful biological distinction, i.e. that categorising people by skin colour is arbitrary as categorising by hair colour. Furthermore, one of the main concepts it uses is intersectionality, which is that all of us belong to multiple categories, e.g. while I’m in a local majority for being white (of skin, and sadly now also a few hairs), I’m also bi, left handed (that used to be seen as sinister, and is literally the etymological origin of the term), and a few other things. This is pretty much the opposite of what you’re saying it is. However, what you say it is, is what I think most opponents of CRT think it is. “Gender theory”… well, I googled, and that seems to be a non-standard term for both (a) gender studies, and (b) the anti-gender movement. The latter appears to be a catch-all for various otherwise disconnected groups whose only commonality is their opposition to the former. And I have no idea which one of these (if either) you’re criticising.