3 ms·
AptX low latency apparently makes it better (35ms is the "guarantee"), but I've honestly not tried it. I'm not going to make my 400FPS on a 240hz monitor low la
by girvo 4y ago
AptX low latency apparently makes it better (35ms is the "guarantee"), but I've honestly not tried it. I'm not going to make my 400FPS on a 240hz monitor low latency gaming in Valorant worse by going wireless for audio.
Though I do use a wireless mouse (G Pro X Superlight) and it's brilliant, though it's wireless adapter is attached to a cord that lets me plug it in to keep going if I forgot to charge it, so its the best of both worlds.
Really, its only my mouse that I move around enough for wireless to be worth it in competitive gaming.
- usednet 4y agoI played competitive FPS games for years at high ranks with a Bluetooth headset before learning of the delay. I did not notice. However, for a while I switched to a Bluetooth keyboard and until I realized the input delay was severely impacting my performance. Wireless mice (non-Bluetooth) on the other hand have low enough latency that most pros are fine using them. Some advice for Bluetooth headset gamers - Bluetooth completely breaks the audio for some games like Battlefield 1. The only solution is to go into device manager and disabling Handsfree Telephony on your device.