2 ms·
Not necessarily. Its just that CPUs are better at sequential so you'd only really use an FPGA if you had grossly parallel plans. And GPUs are better at some set
by dragontamer 5y ago
Not necessarily. Its just that CPUs are better at sequential so you'd only really use an FPGA if you had grossly parallel plans. And GPUs are better at some set of parallel operations.
So you'd only use an FPGA if you needed to do something GPUs and CPUs couldn't do, especially because of how cheap CPUs / GPUs are.
- xwa32 5y agoFPGAs can be low cost too. Another reason to use them is when you need a ton of IO, or my preferred application, real time control systems. In many cases I find it’s easier to get very precise, and predictable, timing in an FPGA.
- sshlocalhost98 5y agoThank you sir/ma’am for the explanation!
- sshlocalhost98 5y agoThank you sir/ma’am for the explanation!