Article had some interest from me, and as a non US citizen I was interested to look in retrospect and try and form a view balanced with benefit of retrospect.

Article had some interest from me, and as a non US citizen I was interested to look in retrospect and try and form a view balanced with benefit of retrospect. But I got to the end and then it says "The Post decided to publish only four of the forty-one slides that Snowden provided. Its exercise of judgment suggests the absence of Snowden’s." No, they were scared of litigation, or similar, that would impact their ability to continue to operate. Snowden had clearly decided this was end game for him. Now, in retrospect,this article comes across as to have been written by a puppet, or run as an editorial by a publication under some kind of duress.