> and it's only after they were successful … their growth slowed. Could this simply be because it’s easy to sustain a high rate of growth when you’re small, an

> and it's only after they were successful … their growth slowed. Could this simply be because it’s easy to sustain a high rate of growth when you’re small, and harder to sustain that same rate of growth when you’re large? See Apple, as another example of a firm who’s growth rate has slowed, as a natural result of their scale.