4 ms·
Aside from that 3.93 is slightly less than 4, it's odd that both employees were in their current position for the same amount of time. I.e. they were part of th
by lmkg 4y ago
Aside from that 3.93 is slightly less than 4, it's odd that both employees were in their current position for the same amount of time. I.e. they were part of the same cohort. What was Twitter doing in June-ish 2018 that resulted in them hiring multiple people in key roles? Was there an expansion, or a re-org, or executive turn-over?
Or just overfitting two data points?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- arthurcolle 4y agoThat's when the Chik-fil-a "scandal" happened https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2018/06/11/square-ceo-jack-dorsey-gets-blasted-from-both-sides-after-a-tweet-about-chick-fil-a/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2018/06...
- tmp_anon_22 4y ago> What was Twitter doing in June-ish 2018 I think your timeline is off, wouldn't executive hires have a much longer timeline from inception to close such that the "event" predicating their hires could have been 5 years, 6 years out?