4 ms·
Remarkable. I guess some of the old timey tinfoil hat theories are still around. If the Americans didn't put the LLR on the moon who did? I think you'll find it
by idiotsecant 5y ago
Remarkable. I guess some of the old timey tinfoil hat theories are still around. If the Americans didn't put the LLR on the moon who did? I think you'll find it difficult to suggest that it's naturally occurring.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
- zardo 5y agoThe moon landings were faked, but they faked them on site.
- jl6 5y agoApollos 1-10 landed on the moon to properly scope it out so they could be sure the faked Apollo 11 would look realistic.
- kube-system 5y ago1+10=11 -- that can't be a coincidence!
- m348e912 5y agoI don't think there are claims that any of the Apollo missions previous to Apollo 11 landed on the moon, so I don't know where you're going with that exactly.
- jl6 5y agoSure, that’s the official story, but you’ve got to do your own research.
- idiotsecant 5y agoDid you delete your original comment?
- m348e912 5y agoNo it was flagged
- walrus01 5y agoThey hired Stanley Kubrick to fake it, but he insisted on authenticity for the cinematic method, so the only solution was to film on-site.
- oh_sigh 5y agoLook at all the comments on those videos and you can see those theorie are still quite popular. I love their behavior as some kind of evidence though. Basically the argument boils down to "Come on, really?..."
- dylan604 5y agoI mean we still have people that believe the earth is flat, so of course Kubrik helped NASA fake the landing on a sound stage in Hollywood.
- importantbrian 5y agoI had a roommate who was really into these conspiracies. I brought up the LLR and his response was that he believes NASA sent rovers and satellites and other automated missions to the moon, but doesn't believe we landed men on the moon. So he said the LLR was placed there by one of those missions as part of the hoax.