3 ms·

And still some properties of humans are innate and you can't "train" on them. So brute force imitation is limited as a method for producing content. An erotic

And still some properties of humans are innate and you can't "train" on them. So brute force imitation is limited as a method for producing content. An erotic novelist has their human brain and human instincts to guide them in writing their work. An AI learns by examples, or at best on a dataset of works labeled by humans. But it doesn't have a human brain at their disposal to query directly and without interfaces to define what's something erotic like a writer has.

humpday69 4y ago
> An erotic novelist has their human brain and human instincts to guide them in writing their work. An ML agent trained on all the erotic novels written, weighted by critical and popular success would might be quite capable of generating sequels, "original" stories, or even stories bespoke to each reader. Good Will Hunting suggests first-hand experience is irreducible: "You can't tell me what it smells like in the Sistine Chapel." https://youtu.be/oRG2jlQWCsY https://youtu.be/oRG2jlQWCsY To which Westworld counters: "Well if you can't tell, does it matter?" https://youtu.be/kaahx4hMxmw https://youtu.be/kaahx4hMxmw I think the cowboys have it. For the moment though, it's still up to humans to decide how this plays out.