5 ms·
You would only drive that because they were not mass produced and it would be unique. None of those look futuristic relative to today. Car companies are show
by segmondy 4y ago
You would only drive that because they were not mass produced and it would be unique. None of those look futuristic relative to today. Car companies are showing guts that's how we got to where we are. Compare cars of 50yrs ago and today, very different. More than design is safety, the body/frame has to be designed to be more tolerant of car crashes. Modern cars weigh much more, have more features and yet are much safer. It's hard to see increment innovation when it's happening right in your face. Think about it, modern economy cars could trash super cars of 50yrs ago.
- stardenburden 4y agoMuch safer? Only for the person inside the metal box. Pedestrian deatgs have been rising for years now, thanks to bigger and heavier cars. There has to be some middle ground for safety inside and on the outside.
- thethethethe 4y agoYeah well maybe those pesky pedestrians should stop being poor and buy a car. Problem solved
- _carbyau_ 4y agoJoe Hockey, is that you?
- fomine3 4y agoUS car market is a problem.
- nappy 4y agoI was interested in this and took a look. Pedestrian deaths in the USA are up a bit, up 10% since 2010, from 33k to 36k in 2019. [1] USA population over the same period has increased from about 6%, from ~309M to 329M. So it's definitely a real increase, but 4% adjusted is pretty moderate. More interesting to me is that over longer time periods, the pedestrian fatality rate was much higher, and the recent increase is far below historic averages. Also interesting is the relatively high rate of pedestrian fatalities (27%) are impaired by alcohol. [2] Generally, it's a very safe time to be a pedestrian, but has gotten slightly worse over the last ten years. [1] https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813079 https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/... [2] https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/historical-fatality-trends/deaths-and-rates/ https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/historical-fatalit...
- vba616 4y ago>4% adjusted A lot of times false precision bugs me but here I think you are comparing fine differences and need a bit more. Using your figures, (36/33)/(329/309), I get 2.5%, not 4%.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]