3 ms·
You make the assumption that the commoner’s privacy will actually be broken, make it so that using the backdoor requires a warrant, and can only be used legally
by riversflow 4y ago
You make the assumption that the commoner’s privacy will actually be broken, make it so that using the backdoor requires a warrant, and can only be used legally on suspected traffickers.
Rapists and slavers shouldn’t have access to military grade encryption, full stop.
- lotsofpulp 4y ago>You make the assumption that the commoner’s privacy will actually be broken Because it already has been proven to have been broken, repeatedly. We have the Snowden documents, PRISM wiretapping, FISA courts, Guantanamo Bay, multiple CIA programs violating human rights', police misconduct that goes unpunished even with hard proof, prosecutors that withhold evidence and are not punished (even protected), and the list goes on and on and on and on.
- riversflow 4y agoThat's my point though, you can't break something that's already broken. We don't have privacy from the USG, and we should stop acting like we do. If you accept that the USG can already snoop on you as they like, why wouldn't you want to make it so that they can go after human traffickers?
- timschmidt 4y agohttps://newamericadotorg.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/Coalition_Response_Letter_-_Encryption_DOJ_event_and_letter_to_Facebook.pdf https://newamericadotorg.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/Coalitio...