3 ms·
I'd love a history of Python tooling
I was reading PEP 517, and what came to mind is that I would love to read a history of Python tooling -- what has been attempted, what worked, what didn't. There must be patterns there, and understanding them would make me a better engineer.
Of course, it doesn't have to be Python. But Python would be a good case-study. Remember easy install? And before pip was a thing? distutils2? "nose tests"? So many things have been tried, so many tools come and gone, that there must be lessons there.
Does anything like that exist?
- eesmith 4y ago"Tooling" is a broad category. coverage.py had its roots in 1998 or so. You can see how primitive testing was with this example from Python 1.3: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/v1.3/Lib/test/test_b2.py https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/v1.3/Lib/test/test_b2... . That's actually one of the most sophisticated ones there. The test_md5 module required manual inspection! setup.py is ancient. And still seemingly the best way to distribute Python packages with C extensions. (I think there were also some autoconf macros for Python dating to the late 1990s.) Maybe read through comp.lang.python from the late 1990s/early 2000s to see what people were doing then? The main location for the Python community was starship.python.net , which is available from archive.org. Eg, https://web.archive.org/web/19990128171929/http://starship.python.net/lib.html https://web.archive.org/web/19990128171929/http://starship.p... . Oh, right? https://web.archive.org/web/20000903065954/http://starship.python.net/crew/aaron_watters/kjbuckets/makefile https://web.archive.org/web/20000903065954/http://starship.p... shows me that by Python 1.5 extensions were built with "make", not "setup.py". Whoa! Look at how to install the LLNLPython Distribution (the fore-forerunner of conda; it included Numerical, CXX, PyPDB, PyHistory, RNG, and Graphics). Perhaps this is too ancient to be meaningful. Try looking for the Python SIGs for a given topic, going back to the history via archive.org, and seeing what the package were like? It's a lot of work.
- eesmith 4y agoForgot to link to the LLNLPython distribution - https://sources.debian.org/data/main/p/python-llnl/11-11.5.1/ https://sources.debian.org/data/main/p/python-llnl/11-11.5.1... .