>Honestly the argument sounds alot like the fictitious argument we make here: "cars kill X number of kids per year, let's ban cars!". A) There's no shortage of

>Honestly the argument sounds alot like the fictitious argument we make here: "cars kill X number of kids per year, let's ban cars!". A) There's no shortage of people make that argument unironically B) If you just change "ban" to "tax to the point that the common man finds another solution" (which is the same sort of "some animals are more equal" situation that dragnets with selective enforcement create) the number of those people increases by an order of magnitude.