> That's only because in USA the justice system depend on the elected president and elected representatives of the State. That’s absolutely not true in the US.

> That's only because in USA the justice system depend on the elected president and elected representatives of the State. That’s absolutely not true in the US. Almost all law enforcement has no connection to the President whatsoever. The FBI does have a connection, the director is appointed with legislative assent, but FBI employees cannot be fired at will by politician or even the director. Further, the FBI didn’t even exist for most of American history, so that’s not why the term evolved the way it did. Also, your country almost certainly operates similarly to US federal law enforcement. Or are you claiming there’s no democratic oversight of or input into the justice system at all? Further, if you don’t consider the justice system part of the government, what is it?