3 ms·
Sure does. They should go build it. Somewhere other than on top of the eight hundred and sixty year old cathedral.
by causi 4y ago
Sure does. They should go build it. Somewhere other than on top of the eight hundred and sixty year old cathedral.
- tremon 4y agoWhy? The original roof is lost, and while we can painstaking recreate it, it still won't be the same roof. So why can't we upgrade such a historical landmark to be a beacon of the future?
- causi 4y agoIs that a serious question? The same reason we don't add dairy cows to cave drawings or put shiplap on the great wall of China or conduct civil war reenactments with predator drones . It's a historical landmark.
- kingkawn 4y agoNa, the part that’s left is a historical landmark. The huge gaping hole in the roof is whatever we like it to be.