3 ms·
How does burning over 100 MWh of electricity provide backing for a minted coin, yet directly burning currency doesn't? What's the difference, besides the pollu
by SamBam 4y ago
How does burning over 100 MWh of electricity provide backing for a minted coin, yet directly burning currency doesn't?
What's the difference, besides the pollution?
- mcintyre1994 4y agoIt could provide some level of scarcity, so if there was demand you could achieve some sort of value. It wouldn't be stable though - you couldn't make a stablecoin on proof of work either AFAIK. I guess it'd have an upper bound at $1 (why buy it for $2 if you can just burn $1), but no lower bound. So.. maybe it is a stablecoin :)