3 ms·
> in-house code may become virally GPL licensed Without reusing any of that code, simply by osmosis? I don't know what the legal theory could be, but is that s
by justin66 4y ago
> in-house code may become virally GPL licensed
Without reusing any of that code, simply by osmosis? I don't know what the legal theory could be, but is that something that has ever happened in the entire history of the GPL?
- tmottabr 4y agono, by writing similar \ equal code somewhere that later other people looking at it could argue is a re-use of the GPL code they looked at and thus causing the whole project to became GPL. it is just them thinking it is better being safe then sorry. if they don't even look at the code there is no way to argue that they are copying it.
- Liquid_Fire 4y agoJust a small correction/clarification - using GPL code inside a non-GPL project doesn't magically cause it to become GPL, it just means you would be committing copyright infringement if you distributed your project afterwards. It's still something you want to avoid, but the outcome would potentially be a lawsuit from the copyright holder, rather than forcing you to relicense your project.