6 ms·
The problem is they only need to win once. What we really need is an immutable section in the EU constitution that anyone who tries to take away basic privacy r
by jdrek1 4y ago
The problem is they only need to win once. What we really need is an immutable section in the EU constitution that anyone who tries to take away basic privacy rights like this is immediately tried for crimes against humanity and sent to prison for the rest of their lives.
- HL33tibCe7 4y ago> The problem is they only need to win once. This is a classic EU tactic
- raverbashing 4y agoNo, they don't need to "win once", rules can be changed. And the ECJ/ECHR are a thing (and yes they have ruled against overreaching rules in the past) (though I like your suggestion)
- blibble 4y ago> The problem is they only need to win once. and due to the structure of the EU: once it is has passed it is almost impossible to rescind no matter who you vote for in the future
- varispeed 4y agoYou can't even vote out people who keep bringing it in in the first place.
- zaroth 4y agoConversely, perhaps protection against this kind of dragnet can be enshrined in Constitutions / Bills of Rights / UN Charters to defend against these attacks more fundamentally.
- gpderetta 4y agoPrivacy rights are in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which is indirectly part of the Treaty of Lisbon, the closest thing to an EU constitution. The CJEU has stuck down laws affecting privacy multiple times. There is always wiggle room of course, and vigilance has to be eternal.
- tluyben2 4y agoThey just change it slightly every time until it passes. But it won’t be very potent in the end; I cannot imagine blanket encryption backdoors etc will be voted in. But if it does I am gone, out of principle. As tech person I cannot stand the stupidity of this all. I hope I am dead before I run out of countries to go to.
- AlgorithmicTime 4y ago