5 ms·
Vouched this not because I agree with it, but because I feel it deserves a reply. You should note that even Trump held Finland as a counterexample to European
by Tuna-Fish 4y ago
Vouched this not because I agree with it, but because I feel it deserves a reply.
You should note that even Trump held Finland as a counterexample to European NATO countries that don't pull their own weight.
Finland is not a country that spends all it's money on social programs and doesn't have a military. Instead, we still have mandatory male conscription, and a very well-armed reserve.
Historically, we have trusted our defense in the principle of being strong enough that even if we knew that the Soviets/Russians could eventually beat us, the costs we could inflict on them would massively outweigh any possible benefit from conquering us. This no longer works because in Ukraine Putin has shown that he does not do cost/benefit analysis for his foreign policy.
- suture 4y agoI was only presenting an American view regarding the notion of “we pay for others at our own expense”. Trumps comments were directed at NATO members and not Finland or Sweden. He also famously said South Korea and Japan needed to spend more. My personal view on the matter is that I support an imperial retreat by the U.S. The EU needs to listen more to the Baltics regarding defense and foreign policy.