4 ms·
There is absolutely nothing interesting in this diff that I can see?
by baisq 4y ago
There is absolutely nothing interesting in this diff that I can see?
- trollied 4y agoYeah, it's just removing Periscope & adding references to other paid services, which have their own terms.
- taubek 4y agoThere is a small part that talks about reverse engineering.
- romanovcode 4y agoYeah, pretty clickbait article. (Because obv. people assume it is something to do with content policy since Musk bought it)
- majewsky 4y agoThere is no article, and it's also not clickbait since there are in fact new ToS. The assumptions that you imply say more about you than about other people.
- capableweb 4y agoSeems the following part was added: > You agree that you will not work around any technical limitations in the software provided to you as part of the Services, or reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble the software, except and only to the extent that applicable law expressly permits. That seems relevant to various groups who calls themselves "hackers" :)
- anthropodie 4y agoSo I am guessing the days of using front-ends like Nitter are limited? I thought Musk would lean more towards an open platform and maybe would even support ActivityPub for Twitter (I can get pretty optimistic lol) but I guess that's not going to happen.
- zwily 4y agoMusk does not own Twitter yet, and won’t for months.
- slightwinder 4y agoIt can also mean they aim to enforce their own new API, on which they are working for some time now. Making some juicy money is always a good motivation for changes.
- coding123 4y agoThe only thing I got from this is that Twitter is an Irish company.