> Only one vote counts. This is literally the textbook example of a system than fails the non-dictatorship criterion. This depends on how you state the non-dic

> Only one vote counts. This is literally the textbook example of a system than fails the non-dictatorship criterion. This depends on how you state the non-dictatorship criterion. Wikipedia's discussion refers to a "single pre-determined person's preferences." But since the dictator is selected randomly, they aren't pre-determined. Further, every vote counts in the sense that every additional vote for a candidate increases the odds of them winning the election. The candidate has an incentive to get additional votes no matter how many votes they currently have. You don't have the situation where its futile to vote because the outcome isn't going to be close.