> On other hand if Twitter is publisher and control what is published. They should be held responsible both criminally and financially of everything they allow

> On other hand if Twitter is publisher and control what is published. They should be held responsible both criminally and financially of everything they allow to be published on their platform. It's fair that Twitter should be held accountable per US legislation, which is covered by Section 230: > Section 230 is a section of Title 47 of the United States Code enacted as part of the United States Communications Decency Act, that generally provides immunity for website platforms with respect to third-party content. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230