2 ms·
> politically infeasible to pass. Probably true. But I would hope that argument could be deflated easily, since it was the senate that was supposed to give sm
by rootusrootus 5y ago
> politically infeasible to pass.
Probably true. But I would hope that argument could be deflated easily, since it was the senate that was supposed to give smaller states a disproportionate amount of influence.
- aidenn0 5y agoWhich is why people who don't want to pass it for this reason will state some other reason, like "5000 representatives is obviously silly and way too many"