3 ms·
>Your own personal definition has no bearing on the fact that there is in fact a substantial discussion going back over a decade on precisely the point in quest
by incomingpain 4y ago
>Your own personal definition has no bearing on the fact that there is in fact a substantial discussion going back over a decade on precisely the point in question.
There's no question there is an imminent civil war. I will concede that I spoke in terms of my own definition. I kind of hold back and make there no such thing as a cold civil war because there's better terms and exacerbating or inflaming by calling it a civil war.
>The Biden clip shown refers to an effort to combat voter fraud. Speaking of echo chambers... It's an unfortunate stumbling over words. Many debunks, though of course the right-fringe went to town on this.
"unfortunate stumbling over words"
"the right-fringe"
No sir, you don't get away with it that easy. Fact Checking something I can literally watch for myself is not going to work.
If you want to say its another gaffe of stumbling over words. This is fine, I don't necessarily believe this but gaffe in which way? He meant to say the opposite or he wasn't meant to admit it?
>I don't believe further discussion here will be fruitful, but thanks.
For the record, this is not the 'right-fringe' this is virtually all republicans. When Biden said the quiet part out loud. It was now on the democrats to ensure there was nothing to justify doubting the results of the election.
Do you not see the imminent civil war? Do you not see your own words are justifying a civil war? Do you not see what a disaster this is?