4 ms·
Why do you like that? They can focus on ONE justification which is 'acceptable'. But one justification is all they need. They don't need more than one for tota
by breakfastduck 4y ago
Why do you like that?
They can focus on ONE justification which is 'acceptable'. But one justification is all they need. They don't need more than one for total access.
- Syonyk 4y agoJust the brazen "Yeah, privacy and stuff are important, But the Children!" phrasing of it. They're not even trying to pretend it's anything but an excuse anymore.
- sharken 4y agoThis is no different from the outrage with Apple and client-side scanning of your device. Yes, we should absolutely do everything we can to protect the children. But losing our privacy is not and can never be an acceptable course of action. There is a frighteningly short distance from giving up privacy due to CSAM, to a full-blown surveillance state.
- DontMindit 4y agoIronically this law will put the childrens futures at enormous risk