3 ms·
>Yeah, Meta will continue to use Jest internally. It still works really well for us, it's just "feature complete" for our use cases so we haven't needed to inve
by ramesh31 5y ago
>Yeah, Meta will continue to use Jest internally. It still works really well for us, it's just "feature complete" for our use cases so we haven't needed to invest in it.
What's the status of Rome? Is that being looked at as a long term replacement?
- zpao 5y agoRome is a completely separate project that Meta no longer owns. You can check https://rome.tools/ https://rome.tools/ for the project status.
- 999900000999 5y agoI'm a mixed of confused and optimistic about this project. On one hand, I would absolutely hate for someone to force me to use one tools, opinions for everything I do in a project. On the other hand, if I just start a new job and I need to get producing, I'd rather have one big tool that just makes JavaScript work. Versus 4 different tools with a bunch of different limitations.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- anaisbetts 5y agoI have full confidence that the people working on it can deliver an incredible product. I have severe doubts that this will be sustainable as a business though, which really sucks
- 999900000999 5y agoWouldn't it make more sense to create the business model first ?