> What’s the upside? Can outside observers really make a considered judgement based on the one-sided and incomplete presentation? Not everything has to have an

> What’s the upside? Can outside observers really make a considered judgement based on the one-sided and incomplete presentation? Not everything has to have an upside. It takes courage to be a whistle-blower. >... and what are we supposed to do with it? We are supposed to learn from others experience, so we don't repeat the mistakes of the past. > I work at a similarly sized and positioned company, and all I can think is that the writer of this post seems very unbalanced. So what? Why do you think your experience at a different org matters in this case? If everything is working well for you, good, carry on.