4 ms·
It is very much the case. Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that does not, on its face, prove a fact in issue but gives rise to a logical inference
by yessirwhatever 4y ago
It is very much the case.
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that does not, on its face, prove a fact in issue but gives rise to a logical inference that the fact exists.
Most criminal convictions are based on circumstantial evidence, although it must be adequate to meet established standards of proof. The fact that she blocked access to her social media tells me that she has lots to hide.
- oliwarner 4y agoCircumstantial evidence of what? She explicitly said: > When I offer to prioritize BIPOC conversations, I'm offering a little equity: a chance to offer a little advice, answer questions, or give a little encouragement. I also can sometimes give portfolio feedback, or an honest evaluation on where an application might go. This is clearly pre-application support. There's no suggestion that other people won't get it, or that their applications won't be dealt with fairly. That would be illegal. Offering pre-app help to disadvantaged and under-represented groups is not. I'm coming at this from a British and European standpoint but our rights here aren't that dissimilar. The guidance on Positive Action is much closer to what she's doing than the crime you're inferring. https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/employers-what-positive-action-workplace https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/e... And you'd block access to your social platforms if you had this shit raining down on you, I guarantee it.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]