5 ms·

take a look at Graphext ( https://www.graphext.com https://www.graphext.com ) it automatically creates the clustering embeddings using BERT for you + great visu

take a look at Graphext ( https://www.graphext.com https://www.graphext.com ) it automatically creates the clustering embeddings using BERT for you + great visualization libraries to interpret the clusters :D it took us 5 years to build the product

CabSauce 4y ago
It sure has to be much, much better than free. Especially if your pricing is 'contact sales'.
m1sta_ 4y ago
I'm not going to contact sales. I have no problem paying though. Part of your value proposition is saving people time, but your sales model is time expensive.
- victorianoi 4y ago
  You are totally right! We are actually making the pricing public next week. We will keep the free version plus starting at $30/month for individual accounts and $150 for team accounts ;)
lmeyerov 4y ago
Latest pygraphistry has this flow for free and OSS, just `pip install graphistry[umap-learn]` or, for transformers, `pip install graphistry[ai]` :) And per the article, with pluggable sentence transformers -> UMAP automatically as part of the auto-featurization: graphistry.nodes(accounts_df).umap().plot() :) We haven't published tutorials yet, just been using with some fraud/cyber/misinfo/genomics/sales/gov/etc teams (including with RAPIDS gpu accel), so cool to see excitement here already! Till then, it should work out-of-the-box with no parameters, and then all sorts of fun things to tune: https://github.com/graphistry/pygraphistry/blob/21fad42412ccb5d007dfe4085d6616c065610a7c/graphistry/umap_utils.py#L252 https://github.com/graphistry/pygraphistry/blob/21fad42412cc...
jasonys 4y ago
I think you should open source the core part of the HTML visualization algos and if ppl like it, they may consider paying for the premium version. I don’t feel like ppl want to move their analysis workflow to yet another platform without trying it enough in their existing workflows (e.g Jupyter/Colab/Databricks notebooks)

CabSauce 4y ago

It sure has to be much, much better than free. Especially if your pricing is 'contact sales'.

m1sta_ 4y ago

I'm not going to contact sales. I have no problem paying though. Part of your value proposition is saving people time, but your sales model is time expensive.

victorianoi 4y ago
You are totally right! We are actually making the pricing public next week. We will keep the free version plus starting at $30/month for individual accounts and $150 for team accounts ;)

lmeyerov 4y ago

Latest pygraphistry has this flow for free and OSS, just `pip install graphistry[umap-learn]` or, for transformers, `pip install graphistry[ai]` :) And per the article, with pluggable sentence transformers -> UMAP automatically as part of the auto-featurization: graphistry.nodes(accounts_df).umap().plot() :) We haven't published tutorials yet, just been using with some fraud/cyber/misinfo/genomics/sales/gov/etc teams (including with RAPIDS gpu accel), so cool to see excitement here already! Till then, it should work out-of-the-box with no parameters, and then all sorts of fun things to tune: https://github.com/graphistry/pygraphistry/blob/21fad42412ccb5d007dfe4085d6616c065610a7c/graphistry/umap_utils.py#L252 https://github.com/graphistry/pygraphistry/blob/21fad42412cc...

jasonys 4y ago

I think you should open source the core part of the HTML visualization algos and if ppl like it, they may consider paying for the premium version. I don’t feel like ppl want to move their analysis workflow to yet another platform without trying it enough in their existing workflows (e.g Jupyter/Colab/Databricks notebooks)