Honestly I don't think the law industry is in a good shape to answer these questions. The text contains misinformation or maybe even propaganda itself. The elec

Honestly I don't think the law industry is in a good shape to answer these questions. The text contains misinformation or maybe even propaganda itself. The election interference in the US 2016 is a joke. Especially in the background of established media trying to pin anything they could find on Trump. But that is secondary as people just seemed to be fed up with the usual suspects. No deeper political analysis necessary. Nobody can tell any of the alleged messages the Russian have allegedly spun. No, any larger influence on the election is probably fantasy or a nice story to save face. Propaganda that worked a bit too well in my opinion. I think the real issue is that established media will lose and the average voter has much more possibilities to get heard because before wide communication networks there was almost no possibility. Or media could just refuse to publish certain information. As I said, the problem of misinformation comes from established interests for the most part. So the problem of misinformation certainly won't be solved with further censorship. Technically difficult to implement anyway. And that is truly a blessing, even if there is abuse of such channels.