3 ms·
Context matters. The LGBTQ+ community is not known for having weapons and for bringing those to the table during debates. It is not known for committing violenc
by Karawebnetwork 4y ago
Context matters. The LGBTQ+ community is not known for having weapons and for bringing those to the table during debates. It is not known for committing violence either.
This contrasts severely with the crowd that Trump was addressing at the time. Their spaces were filled with calls to weaponization, civil wars and conspiracies against the system itself. The messages were written after people had made threats and refused to engage with the system. This is why it was so dangerous at the time, as we can now see clearly with insight after what ultimately happened.
Lori Lightfoot's call to arms is not happening within that context.
Simply looking at the dictionary will enlighten you: "something that makes people want to take action and get involved in an attempt to deal with a bad situation. He issued a call to arms on behalf of the environment."
Using this example from Macmillan Dictionary, no one is gathering firearms to shoot at the wind. What they are doing is paying attention to the issue and challenging the opposition within the scope of the law and political system.
The LGBTQ+ community is simply lawyering up, making noise about upcoming laws, legally protesting and pushing back using the existing political system. This is usually in the form of strongly written letters to representatives.
All of this is not only legal, it is encouraged behavior in the American political system.
In the end, being LGBTQ+ is not a political identity. It is not "leftist" or "rightist". It is simply the way some people are. Some of them extremist on the left while others are extremist on the right. LGBTQ+ individuals are found on the entire spectrum of American politics.
- theandrewbailey 4y agoWhen we're talking about bans on social media, context doesn't matter. How many stories have you read of someone trying to argue and explain context to overturn a ban, only to have the appeal rejected? (And if it is overturned, it's only because strings were pulled.) When someone gets banned, a reason might be given, but context never is.
- Karawebnetwork 4y agoIf I have a weapon in my hand and yell "I will kill you" at someone, this is a threat. If I you give me a teddy bear with a pun that I hate on it and I tell you "I will kill you" with a smile on my face, that's not a threat. It depends on the context. The first person would go to jail. The second person would not. Analyzing the context of any situation is why we have a legal system with judges and juries.