5 ms·
We could get into the detail but I won't, it's a waste of time here. But the very denial of the election result, and all that stems from that, is enough. If y
by LightG 4y ago
We could get into the detail but I won't, it's a waste of time here.
But the very denial of the election result, and all that stems from that, is enough.
If you can't see that, then you're a bigger fool than most of us.
- _-david-_ 4y agoLots of people deny the 2000 election. Lots of people deny the 2016 election. Lots of people deny the 2020 election. Why is denial of 2020 worse than any of the others? Stacy Abrams is still claiming her election was stolen. Denial of elections is quite common in the US.
- lp0_on_fire 4y agoUsually when this point is brought up you get swarms of comments saying "well that's different". The only "different" things I see are the political affiliations.
- LightG 4y ago* mumbles something about 'lots of people' are not the POTUS in the face of countless, countless court hearings to confirm that fraud didn't take place at scale and the result was valid. * opines about the effect these continual denials have on a rabid, angry ... loser ... voter base. * the result? Jan 6. If you can't see that, good luck. It's f@cking so simple.