3 ms·
True, but also, newspapers were still very financially stable. The number of gainfully employed journalists throughout the U.S. was far greater. Regional and ci
by next_xibalba 4y ago
True, but also, newspapers were still very financially stable. The number of gainfully employed journalists throughout the U.S. was far greater. Regional and city newspapers thrived. Now, many are dead and many of the survivors are slowly dying. Print news is now looking like a power law: a handful flourish (NYT, WSJ, WaPo, etc.) and a long tail struggles to stay afloat. These outcomes are, in part, created by people's perception that the information generated by news organizations is a both a commodity and is free. Neither is actually true.
- bigDinosaur 4y agoSurely the newspapers are partly to blame for this perception going back more than one hundred years: $2 (or whatever) was never the actual cost to fund the news.