“Allowed” isn’t language that GP is using; you’re introducing that. In fact, GP is suggesting those factions do continue to raise, under a different banner. G

“Allowed” isn’t language that GP is using; you’re introducing that. In fact, GP is suggesting those factions do continue to raise, under a different banner. GP’s concern, which I share, is that there’s a greater deal of effectiveness that’s being impacted by outside perceptions. EA should inherently be concerned with making the top of their altruism dollar funnel as wide as possible, to channel the most good most effectively. If the potential non-AI-safety money being left on the table is a greater amount than the money raised for AI-safety causes, is that most effective? For whom? In a world where that potential money enters the funnel, and AI-safety has and grows a separate funnel of its own, how is that not better?