When you say > and not doesn't risk crashes are you intentionally writing !(!(riskcrash(bitcoin)))? Because if that is what you wanted to say then I agree wi

When you say > and not doesn't risk crashes are you intentionally writing !(!(riskcrash(bitcoin)))? Because if that is what you wanted to say then I agree with you, but if you really wanted to say "doesn't risk a crash in value like bitcoin exposes me to" you do realize that that is simply untrue because no one knows the financial basis of Tether? Which means that at any moment it might go to 0?