3 ms·
Not really. Clickhouse is amazing, but if you want to run it at massive scale you’ll have to invest a lot into sharding and clustering and all that. Druid is mo
by richieartoul 4y ago
Not really. Clickhouse is amazing, but if you want to run it at massive scale you’ll have to invest a lot into sharding and clustering and all that. Druid is more distributed by default, but doesn’t support as sophisticated of queries as Clickhouse does.
Neither Clickhouse nor Druid can hold a candle to what Snowflake can do in terms of query capabilities, as well as the flexibility and richness of their product.
That’s just scratching the surface. They’re completely different product categories IMO, although they have a lot of technical / architectural overlap depending on how much you squint.
Devil is in the details basically.
- FridgeSeal 4y ago> Neither Clickhouse nor Druid can hold a candle to what Snowflake can do in terms of query capabilities, as well as the flexibility and richness of their product. Do you have something specific in mind? My previous experience with Snowflake was the query functionality was lacking, performance was subpar (at best), and half the purported features were a joke (looking at you “Kafka integration”) or just gimmicky (the time travel feature)
- AdamProut 4y agoClickhouse and Druid are not very good at complex OLAP queries. Clickhouse is pretty upfront about needing to denormalize your schema To avoid distributed joins. Neither are anywhere close to the performance of top DWs on analytical benchmarks like TPC-H or TPC-DS