4 ms·
That's why I mentioned the multiple parties. But I understand your point. It would just be the next step for them to sneak in all kinds of words.
by toffi-fee 4y ago
That's why I mentioned the multiple parties.
But I understand your point. It would just be the next step for them to sneak in all kinds of words.
- dane-pgp 4y agoWe're not just talking about words here, though. You have to ask yourself: * Who do I trust to look at the pictures in the government database? * Who does the government trust to look at these pictures? * Who would even be willing to look at these pictures? These are probably disjoint sets, leading to a very empty intersection. Unfortunately, the logical impossibility of a government implementing a system that citizens should be happy with is not a barrier to it implementing some other system which it claims is good enough.