Why is it so important to you that a conspiracy must exist? What pushed you to ignore evidence so hard that you appear to think that a question I'd already answ

Why is it so important to you that a conspiracy must exist? What pushed you to ignore evidence so hard that you appear to think that a question I'd already answered is some giant gotcha? (What's different now? The market has cooled massively for other reasons.) If you look at the new rules the SEC announced, they're so poorly written that no bank would see them as more than an accounting checkbox. Those rules are certainly not the reason for winding down a line of business. If you want to attack connections between finance and the government, why not focus on real ones? Like, why are the new SEC policies so toothless? Who wrote them, and why? It could easily be someone from GS, even! But people are a lot more likely to listen to you if you save your criticism for things that are based on facts and clear reasoning. A massive web of innuendo is worth a lot less than one direct problem.