3 ms·

I thought twitter, like most social media sites, have terms of service that users agree to. If they did, and a poster (famous or not) repeatedly violated them,

I thought twitter, like most social media sites, have terms of service that users agree to. If they did, and a poster (famous or not) repeatedly violated them, the there are two options: admit no terms or service or invoke the penalty. No freedom of speech for private actors and the state did not prosecute trump. Make it an unpatrolled forum and those who aren’t interested in controversy will exit. Guess the trolls make twitter more money?

jimmygrapes 5y ago
The issue here is more of how vague the rules were and what interpretation the moderator team/algorithm used. If my rules are "you can't be mean" and you say "I don't like how you [...]" am I within my rights to say that was "mean"? Because that's basically what happened.
- arinlen 5y ago
  > The issue here is more of how vague the rules were and what interpretation the moderator team/algorithm used. This is not true at all. Twitter's rules were clear cut, and if anything Trump enjoyed the privilege of not having clear-cut rules enforced on him due to the position he held. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspensio...