3 ms·
This seems to target the "bigger" cpu's in a car, but there are tens of ECU's that are far smaller and that I think could benefit from a better platform. A much
by RealityVoid 4y ago
This seems to target the "bigger" cpu's in a car, but there are tens of ECU's that are far smaller and that I think could benefit from a better platform. A much better one than AUTOSAR, which is a nightmare to work with. I swear I don't know what automakers are thinking with pushing AUTOSAR.
- wyldfire 4y agoMaybe zephyr [1] is a good option for those ECUs? or hubris [2]? [1] https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/introduction/index.html https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/introduction/index.htm... [2] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris
- AlotOfReading 4y agoZephyr hasn't finished their certification package, to the best of my knowledge. It was supposed to be finished late last year, but I'm not sure what the current status is. That's typically a bare minimum for RTOS vendor selection, and the turnaround time between selection and deployment is typically 3+ years. Unfortunately still a bit premature right now.