3 ms·
And Heller, and non-binding opinions of it from the last 200 years. If I interpret the first amendment to only apply to brown eyed people, and then defend that
by vorpalhex 5y ago
And Heller, and non-binding opinions of it from the last 200 years.
If I interpret the first amendment to only apply to brown eyed people, and then defend that very odd interpretation, am I still a defender of the first amendment?
- mLuby 5y agoIf you interpret the 4th amendment's "papers" to mean only tree-based sheets, not documents which might be electronic, are you really a defender of the 4th amendment? > The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…
- cperciva 5y agoIf you want to be etymologically pedantic, "papers" should mean only sheets of papyrus.