2 ms·

Thanks for your thoughtful comment. As you sensed, I supported their old mission and parts of their new mission. However, I agree that if they view their new m

Thanks for your thoughtful comment. As you sensed, I supported their old mission and parts of their new mission. However, I agree that if they view their new mission to be "selling themselves" to one side or the other, that would indeed detract from my willingness to continue supporting them long-term.

nickff 4y ago
Thanks for sharing more of your perspective. I just can't imagine what conversations happened inside the organization, where they were willing to ghost write for Heard and sell off a position to her, then switch to taking money from the other side; all of this in a completely private dispute with no public interest on either side, other than visibility. This whole situation seems absurd to me. Were they desperate for money? Or fans of Amber Heard? Or were they swept up in enthusiasm about a high-profile case of spousal abuse? I am not aware of the ACLU taking a general position on defamation suits between private parties in the past.