5 ms·
I'm sick of these posts. What I got out of the article was "I think I know how Google should design its product, and thus I deem decisions not in agreement to b
by joshma 15y ago
I'm sick of these posts. What I got out of the article was "I think I know how Google should design its product, and thus I deem decisions not in agreement to be total bullshit."
Personally, I prefer to respect the work they've put into the product and to accept that they may have insights deeper than mine. It's evident from Google's announcement that they see more complex issues around pseudonyms, and I will form an opinion after I see their changes. I do not understand this attitude of "Fuck those guys" - so much anger over a social network!
- justina1 15y agoThis. Thoughtful analysis is far more useful than these sensationalist rants.
- p4r4d0x 15y agoSober, thoughtful analysis doesn't get as many pageviews though.
- rhizome 15y agoWhy do you think they're hiding these "deeper insights," do they think we're too stupid to understand?
- tedunangst 15y agoHiding one's deeper insights into a market's dynamics is frequently a competitive advantage.
- rhizome 15y agoIf these Google insights into the undesirability of anonymity are so hidden, can they even be said to exist? As the poster asserts?
- tedunangst 15y agoAsking if a hidden insight can exist is a peculiar phrasing, but anyway, one example I can think of is some study that demonstrated people using their real names were 50% more likely to remain active users two years after registration. Or "abuse", however defined, was reduced by 40%. Whatever. The point is that if Google keeps such knowledge secret, other networks that allow anonymous users will be at a competitive disadvantage. I have no idea what such effects may be, I only allow for the possibility they exist.
- rhizome 15y agoSeems like pretty thin reasoning to hang the (great-) grandparent's assertion.
- fluidcruft 15y agoWhat I got out of the article is "Google isn't offering a product I want." Yeah, there's an element of "this is the product I do want" involved in that. I think Google's criticized because people who are dissatisfied with Facebook hoped Google would challenge Facebooks flaws, not duplicate them. Google may well have put all sorts of deep thought into it--but if they're just going to duplicate unliked features of a product that users merely tollerate without offering any real incremental value, why should they deserve to succeed?