If I have a good home and a job that can be done from it why not profit? That "luxury" and "privilege" does not touch others, instead some who can potentially h

If I have a good home and a job that can be done from it why not profit? That "luxury" and "privilege" does not touch others, instead some who can potentially have better homes that can't because working in a specific expensive location they can't buy nor rent something as good, but potentially can in another far cheaper location? 100% flexibility is simply unsustainable: a company can't keep offices for some only or people keep moving gears from home to office and vice versa or having double gears in both location. A call center operator can work from home and perhaps instead of a cubicle in a city can afford a larger home in the countryside having a better life WFH, banking, assurances, various tertiary sector jobs can be done from remote, not just techies, skilled and rich.