4 ms·
It's true you can do something similar with Lambda, but our architecture is much better suited to do this efficiently, especially in the case of scripts that ar
by kentonv 4y ago
It's true you can do something similar with Lambda, but our architecture is much better suited to do this efficiently, especially in the case of scripts that aren't invoked very often.
This is a new product in the very early stages, which requires a high-touch feedback cycle with our early customers. You can expect once it's further along, you'll be able to sign up for it without talking to us first, and the pricing will be better than Lambda.
- bluelightning2k 4y agoI'm really interested in this. We currently do something like: post code to a serverless function -> function executes code and returns output as HTTP. This works but it's hard & requires a lot of adapter code (things like async errors). I'd really like to talk about this - I understand that might not be possible. I filled in the form, any idea when we might hear something? Do you support arbitrary npm modules?