> There should be way more pop science stuff that would explain old (decades or centuries old) concepts to the lay public instead of the hottest new thing of th

> There should be way more pop science stuff that would explain old (decades or centuries old) concepts to the lay public instead of the hottest new thing of the day While I agree that there needs to be more easily accessible science articles that are still pertinent today, I didn’t get the impression that that’s what Quanta was going for. Their target audience isn’t necessarily the lay public but instead someone who is comfortable in this space and has more than a passing knowledge. My point is that there is room for both - something “hard to chew” like Quanta and something more “pop”.