4 ms·
That seems disingenuous. If sqlite3 isn't a server, then neither is apache2. But in reality they're both binaries 'serving' 'files' over an interface. You're ju
by throwoutway 4y ago
That seems disingenuous. If sqlite3 isn't a server, then neither is apache2. But in reality they're both binaries 'serving' 'files' over an interface. You're just hosting them on the same machine, reverting to a monolith-style deployment. Which is fine, but then lets call it what it is.
- dagw 4y agoBut in reality they're both binaries 'serving' 'files' over an interface. By that definition fopen() is also a server.
- WorldMaker 4y agoAccording to Plan9, fopen() is also a server.
- ignoramous 4y ago> That seems disingenuous. If sqlite3 isn't a server, then neither is apache2. Your argument really is with Dr. Richard Hipp: https://sqlite.org/serverless.html https://sqlite.org/serverless.html