5 ms·
That’s using a different index than I used. Neither is right or wrong, hard to define “dot com” bubble stocks precisely
by jshen 4y ago
That’s using a different index than I used. Neither is right or wrong, hard to define “dot com” bubble stocks precisely
- scarface74 4y agoActually I am wrong. The NASDAQ was the index I should have referred to. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/apr/23/nasdaq-new-record-high-dotcom-bubble https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/apr/23/nasdaq-new-... It took 15 years.
- sulam 4y agoYa'll are talking past each other. Since I made the comment, I will define my terms more precisely. In 2-3 years someone who consistently invests a fixed portion of their earnings/assets into a weighted vehicle/basket will be enjoying an appreciating net worth. I'm not claiming to be able to call the bottom, but I'm also not measuring "recovering" as peak-to-peak. Peak to peak would be past-tense "recovered".