5 ms·
Oh man that's a riot. Thanks for sharing. There are several classes of problem that really seem to bring out the patent crackpots, of which perpetual motion is
by thrtythreeforty 4y ago
Oh man that's a riot. Thanks for sharing.
There are several classes of problem that really seem to bring out the patent crackpots, of which perpetual motion is the most classic. Apparently data compression is another.
The one I've personally run into is "secure" or "trusted" embedded systems. I've been contacted by a lot of people who believe that they can make a perfectly secure and trustworthy secret storage system just by building it out of an embedded Linux system. When I try to explain how a secure element is basically exactly the opposite of a Linux box, the excuses and bluster prevent me from actually making any progress in explaining.
There's a term for this: "Not even wrong." That is, so off base that "wrong" is generous!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong
- maweki 4y ago> There are several classes of problem that really seem to bring out the [...] crackpots You wouldn't believe how many people on reddit have proved the Collatz conjecture or found a polytime algorithm for 3-SAT... If a problem is hard enough and stated easily enough, it is crackpot-central.
- thrtythreeforty 4y ago3-SAT is one of those where it really falls down fast, because you can just ask them for a solution for some arbitrary 3-SAT problem. By their own admission, they've found an algorithm!
- maweki 4y agoA polytime algorithm, even an implementation of one, does not alone make a competitive SAT-solver for any of the ongoing SAT-competitions.