3 ms·
Or alternatively, the Pulitzer board is biased. I invite you to find a single right-winger among the 19 in the list: Elizabeth Alexander, Anne Applebaum, Nancy
by cato_the_elder 4y ago
Or alternatively, the Pulitzer board is biased.
I invite you to find a single right-winger among the 19 in the list: Elizabeth Alexander, Anne Applebaum, Nancy Barnes, Lee C. Bollinger, Katherine Boo, Neil Brown, Nicole Carroll, Steve Coll, Gail Collins, John Daniszewski, Gabriel Escobar, Carlos Lozada, Kelly Lytle Hernandez, Kevin Merida, Marjorie Miller, Viet Thanh Nguyen, Emily Ramshaw, David Remnick, Tommie Shelby. [1]
You have a point about news sources being biased and nonobjective, but that applies to the liberal ones two.
[1]: https://www.pulitzer.org/board/2022 https://www.pulitzer.org/board/2022
- hedora 4y agoThis is precisely why I asked for an example of reputable reporting from the right. I'm beginning to suspect it is no longer exists at any significant scale. The Pulitzer board's bias (or lack thereof) doesn't magically invalidate the concrete evidence and painstaking documentation the winners performed. Most, if not all, of the winners' work can and has been independently validated by other reporters.
- cato_the_elder 4y ago> This is precisely why I asked for an example of reputable reporting from the right. Of course it exist, if the standard to compare with is Washington Post. Here are some examples: Reason, WSJ, National Review and The Spectator all have the same Media Bias/Fact Check [1] rating as the Post. (or better) > The Pulitzer board's bias (or lack of) Let's agree (or disagree) on the facts instead of going on with the hypotheticals. Were you able to find a single right-winger on the board? > validated by other reporters Which again, are mostly liberals. We live in an era dominated by liberals, so we should be really skeptical about assertions like "truth has a liberal bias". [1]: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/