> These guys are free to do whatever they want as long as they don’t break any laws. In other words, the author proposes to make laws such that it would be ill

> These guys are free to do whatever they want as long as they don’t break any laws. In other words, the author proposes to make laws such that it would be illegal - roughly speaking - to own a $bln. The point, of course, is, should we consider that good enough - or not - to support with laws?